Stress, Success, and the Silent Struggle: Mental Health in the Workplace

Explore the historical and modern challenges of workplace stress, its connection to mental health, and its manifestation on social media.

Portrait of Luis Miranda, Web Developer and AWS Cloud Expert

Luis Miranda · Follow

2024-12-12 · 0 min read
Share this Story

Introduction: The Quiet Crisis

As societies progress, so too do our responsibilities, pressures, and expectations. The idea of mental health as a spectrum—where conditions range from mild to severe—has only recently gained traction. But mental health struggles in the workplace are anything but new. For centuries, workers across different fields have endured relentless pressures, often without support, acceptance, or understanding. With the rise of social media, these silent battles have entered the public eye, and the consequences are rippling across screens around the world.

In this exploration, we’ll look back at the forces that have influenced how society perceives workplace stress and mental health, and how unaddressed struggles can manifest in unexpected ways—sometimes in the form of online hostility. The path to empathy begins with understanding.

The Industrial Revolution: Humanity Meets the Machine

The story begins in the late 18th century, with the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, a period that radically transformed the world of work. Until this era, people primarily worked in small-scale family businesses or on farms, with nature governing the rhythm of their lives. But factories introduced a new cadence—one dictated by the relentless ticking of the clock and the hum of machinery. Towns and cities became bustling hubs, filled with workers bound to assembly lines, tasked with repetitive, grueling tasks that demanded constant precision and endurance.

Historian Thomas Dublin’s Women at Work (1979) sheds light on the experiences of young women in factories during this period. These women, often working far from home and support systems, faced not only physical strain but also emotional distress in the form of isolation and exhaustion. With no formal acknowledgment of mental health challenges, these women endured what they could, often dismissing their suffering as part of life’s struggles.

However, the increasing rate of what doctors called “nervous breakdowns” in factory workers and the broader working class hinted at something deeper. In England, by the mid-19th century, concerns about “nervous disorders” among factory laborers began to surface, though it was attributed more to “moral weakness” than mental health. The groundwork for understanding the toll of labor was being laid, albeit with a long road ahead.

The White-Collar Shift: Burnout in the Boardroom

With the arrival of the 20th century, the workplace underwent another shift: the rise of the white-collar workforce. No longer tied to physical labor, a growing class of clerks, managers, and executives found themselves bound to desks rather than machines. The shift from blue-collar to white-collar work appeared, on the surface, as a gentler lifestyle, but brought new pressures: competition, deadlines, and the pervasive sense of needing to climb the corporate ladder.

By the 1920s, psychologists in the U.S. began observing a new phenomenon among corporate employees: burnout. This wasn’t the physical burnout of factory work but a psychological exhaustion that left individuals mentally drained and irritable. Daniel Rodgers, in his book The Work Ethic in Industrial America (1978), explored how the managerial class faced unique stresses. The high demands on time and loyalty, coupled with social expectations to “make it,” left individuals vulnerable to what was then termed “neurasthenia”—an umbrella term for symptoms like fatigue, irritability, and anxiety.

Yet, the stigma around mental health meant that these white-collar workers rarely discussed their struggles openly. Instead, they bottled up frustrations, sometimes taking their stress out on family members or workers in lower ranks. It was an early example of how workplace stress could spill into other areas of life—long before the age of Twitter rants and Facebook posts.

World War II: A Turning Point in Workplace Psychology

The true beginnings of mental health recognition in the workplace can be traced back to the impact of World War II. The war years were a time of high-stress work for soldiers and civilians alike, with factory workers churning out wartime supplies around the clock and soldiers enduring unimaginable trauma on the frontlines. Psychologists like British psychiatrist Dr. John Bowlby began researching the long-term effects of trauma on individuals, paving the way for fields like occupational and industrial psychology.

Following WWII, corporations started exploring the idea that mental health might be integral to productivity. Though in its infancy, this era introduced workplace mental health programs, largely inspired by military observations of stress’s toll on efficiency. It was a small but crucial step towards understanding occupational stress and its effects on behavior.

In the 1950s, however, workplace mental health initiatives remained rare, primarily confined to the largest corporations. The majority of workers still viewed stress as a personal issue, a struggle they needed to handle privately, often without help.

The Digital Age: Social Media and Public Meltdowns

The true clash between mental health and public behavior wouldn’t occur until the rise of the internet and, later, social media. By the early 2000s, technology and social media had transformed communication, with platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and eventually Instagram giving people a platform to share their daily lives—and their frustrations.

Workplace stress, once hidden behind closed doors, began spilling onto the public domain of social media. In 2017, a study by the American Psychological Association showed that 60% of U.S. workers felt that social media blurred the boundaries between work and personal life, impacting mental health. Many workers reported experiencing an increased need to vent their frustrations publicly, feeling an overwhelming pressure to meet the expectations of both their job and their social image.

On social media, this has often manifested as outbursts, impulsive comments, and even hostility—behavior frequently attributed to “poor character” rather than acknowledged as a potential symptom of workplace-related stress or mental health issues. It’s an echo of the past when factory workers and white-collar professionals faced intense, misunderstood struggles. Yet, in the digital age, these struggles are documented and visible to the world.

The Conversation Today: Advocacy and Awareness

In recent years, mental health advocates have been working to destigmatize conversations around workplace stress and its impact on behavior. With mental health now recognized as existing on a spectrum, experts argue for a nuanced understanding of how stress from jobs like healthcare, teaching, and tech might influence behavior online. It’s a call for compassion in a world quick to label and judge.

Conversations around the hashtag #MentalHealthSpectrum and campaigns by organizations like the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) are working to educate the public on how behaviors that might seem aggressive or impulsive could be rooted in untreated mental health struggles. Advocates aim to foster empathy, encouraging people to think twice before condemning someone based on online behavior, reminding the world that everyone carries unseen burdens.

In Part 2, we’ll look more deeply at specific professions and how research has connected their unique stressors to certain types of online behavior, diving into case studies that show the tangible impact of occupational stress on social media interactions.

References

Share this Story